by
Olya Veselova and Randall DavisSummary
A huge chunk of this paper can be summarized through one quote, "people pay unequal attention to different features". The goal for the authors is to have a system be able to learn descriptions from a single example. The system should only capture the relevant features that users would care about. The paper made heavy use of Goldmeier's work on human perception. Goldmeier had properties called singularities, which were features that small variations in had a qualitative difference. Goldmeier's singularities include vertically, symmetry, parallelism, horizontally and straightness. The paper lists the importance of these different constraints. This allows for a score. The score can be adjusted by obstruction, tension lines, and grouping. An example is if two lines are near they being parallel is an important constraint. If they are far away and a number of primitives are between them that constraint isn't so important.To test their system the created a study and measured how often their system agreed with people's perceptual judgments on near-perfect drawings.
1 comment:
A constraint ranking system is quite cool. I love research that concerns visual perception of the brain, such as the shape rotation tests (mentioned in Davis's "Why are Intelligence?"), and having a study to see if a computer can model some human visual components is pretty nifty.
Post a Comment